« Amazing
Main
Four Stone Hearth 67 Is Up »
May 19, 2009
An Inscribed Jar Handle and a Seal
There are in couple of interesting finds in the news today.
Ha'aretz reported the first. The English tanslation of the origainal Ha'aretz Hebrew article is loaded with problems and I think even the Hebrew, which I cannot read with great fluency, has a few problems of its own. The picture on the left is from Ha'aretz and other than it could have been higher resolution and better lit there is really nothing wrong with it. The inscription is on a jar handle and reads,
b]n nḥm
so]n of Nacham (or Nechum)
But the Ha'aretz article has mnḥm, Menachem. While I was trying to figure out the reading and the vertical line between the m/n and the clear n, Robert Deutsch, in a comment reported on Jim West's blog, did it for me. Both nḥm and mnḥm occur in epigraphic texts as well as in the Hebrew Bible. One can find useful discussions of this inscription on the Biblical Studies and the ANE-2 list servers. Claude Mariottini also has provided some commentary.
Update (May 20, 2009):
Upon closer inspection, the first letter is almost certainly an m. See Rochelle's comments below. So what to do with he short vertical line? Could it be a y?
The second interesting find is a broken seal, not a seal impression, but a seal. It comes from City of David excavations. The Israel Antiquities Authority (temporary link) announced the find and the picture to the left is by Vladimir Naykhin of the IAA. It comes from the first temple period. The inscription on the bone seal reads,
lšʾl[
ryhw (thingy) [
Even if the last letter is broken off, the first line is fairly clear, "belonging to Saul." No, this is not that Saul. The second line is likely a patronym but I can't find a name with that spelling in the Hebrew Bible or Hebrew epigraphic material. Assuming the last three letters are a theophoric element, perhaps one could compare the name rʾyh, Reaiah, in 1 Chronicles 4:2 and elsewhere.
The article says the thingy is a "floral image or a tiny fruit" but it looks more like a thingy to me.
Update: Christopher Rollston has a very interesting post on the Saul seal at Jim's site. Among other things, he speculates on the name in the second line and the possibility that it begins in the broken part of the first line.
Posted by Duane Smith at May 19, 2009 2:16 PM | Read more on Archaeology |
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.telecomtally.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2880
Comments
Duane,
Copy, paste into Adobe Photoshop. Adjust brightness. Entire inscription clear.
Nu, what's the problem? menachum/menacham and nachum are just two names... still around, too.
Posted by: rochelle at May 20, 2009 12:50 AM
Oh, I see what the kvetching is all about. Once you adjust the brightness and contrast, it's clear. That first glyph is a mem.
Posted by: rochelle at May 20, 2009 12:56 AM
Post a comment
Please read Abnormal Interest's Comments Policy.